Russian edition of Vogue featured Maryna Linchuk in the role of modern mobile mother.
Below are the pictures from her photo session.
Look at the images (taken from here) and then read the comments of Russian netizens (most of whom did not like the photographs).
Maryna Linchuk Photo Session
Comments of Russian netizens
crunge: What a horror! Brick-faced mother.
k_butsky: Ahh-hha-hhha (in sad voice). That’s all I can say about it.
minmanya: Separately from kids the girl is very nice. But with kids she doesn’t combine at all.
varusa (replying to the comment above): The kids possibly were added to her with Photoshop %))
oalona: To the question “Your most vivid impression of the New York streets?”, Lubomirski (a photographer) answers: “My wife hurrying for different matters, with our newborn son in her arms. This is the whole point of New York.”
The model doesn’t have children, but the photographer shows the actual picture.
tuksa: The pictures are unpleasant. A woman with cold angry face and miserable kids. From the first picture, I would even say that she stole the children … for organs.
kid_carrier: Inspired by Victoria Beckham. In my opinion, before her nobody carried and flashed the young children so often as her.
yehydna: Definitely [she is] not mother of these children. And possibly not mother at all [yet]. Not even a spark of maternal love in her eyes. The Snow Queen…
tootsy: I immediately thought that the model is apart from the children by the way she keeps the younger one by his waist. Mothers who constantly carry children quickly develop the habit to put them on the thigh.
pacis: Yes, she keeps the baby as a bag :) This photo session turned out to be somewhat insane.
that_exception: Feel somehow sorry for the kids, especially the little baby looks sad… The outfits are interesting, however.
skorosti net: With such levitation of her ponytail, as in the first photo, I wonder at what speed she is dragging the child – the one she is holding by hand ))))))
depend on mood: I’d say that in the first picture is [shown] Mary Poppins =)
nia4om: Mother doesn’t look at children on any of the photos :-(
fyo (replying to the comment above): And it is mutual!
cat and fox: Very beautiful photos) and the girl, and her outfits, and children who for me don’t look apart from her. And here I am, also too thin and angry, and probably not mother to my child))
zhgonka: It’s not about the model’s face, or whether she is mother of the kids, but about the message of these pictures. Being a mom - is fashionable, she can be mobile, and even bright and bold (unexpectedly) if she is not sitting at home and not dying from postpartum depression. Definitely, the photo shoot was a success. I admire the photos, the idea and the implementation.
laustic (replying to the comment above): Support! So many have the association that once there are children – you can sit at home wrapped in bathrobe. And that the children are a burden and the end of mother’s life as a woman.
syroeshka (also replying to zhgonka): I also think so. It could be just one day a year, for example birthday or wedding, so she looks like “broke free” and in all her glory =)
And the angry face is photographer’s fault, most likely, he demanded from the model the determined expression of sexuality and vamp look.
klodiya malfoy: I like the idea of the session, but not the execution. And it’s not the cold look, or that the model ”is not their mother” – no. Simply there is a contrast between the “podium” girl with her artificiality and the spontaneity of children. The picture does not combine. As if it is glued from a number of different pictures…
But the idea is cool)